856.795.6026
  807 Haddon Avenue,
Haddonfield, NJ 08033
Phone: 856-795-6026
Fax: 856.795.4911

 

Search Our Site:


From Our Newsletters:

The Wandry Taxpayers Found The Formula

April 2012 | Issue 57 Introduction Taxpayers making gifts of hard-to-value property will sometimes employ a “formula clause” which enables them to retroactively adjust the size of their gift based on a value determination carried out subsequently to when the gift was made.  This is usually done in order to keep the overall size of [...] More...

Courts Allow Reallocation of Gifted Shares

January 2012 | Issue 56 Introduction The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Petter v. Commissioner, 653 F. 3d 1012, (8/4/11), found for the taxpayer in a case involving the use of a “formula clause” to reallocate gifts of property to heirs and charity. > The Plan Anne Petter lived in Washington [...] More...

Book Value was 2% of Fair Market Value in NJ Buyout Case

November 2011 | Issue 55 In Estate of Cohen v. Booth Computers (421 N.J. Super. 134, 22A. 3d 991, July 13, 2011), the question addressed was whether a family partnership agreement that provides for a buyout based on net book value may be enforced when the disparity between book value and fair market value is [...] More...

Join Our Mailing List...

View our Library...

 

 
 

House Proposal Could Spell the End of Minority Valuation Discounts

January 2009 | Issue 32

Congressman Earl Pomeroy has introduced a bill (H. R. 436; “Certain Estate Tax Relief Act of 2000“) which, among other things, seeks to impose new valuation rules for transfers of certain kinds of assets. The main thrust of the bill, which was introduced January 9, 2009, is to fix the federal estate tax exemption at $3,500,000, and set the tax rate for estates exceeding that amount at 45%. The bill also seeks to repeal the new carryover basis rules.

The Discount Situation Now
Under current law, when an individual transfers a partnership interest, by gift or at death, the interest is valued at fair market value. Since such interests can have limited marketability, and often do not confer control of the partnership to their holder, business appraisers will apply valuation discounts to the value of the assets held by the partnership. For example, if a taxpayer transfers a 10% interest in a partnership that owns non-business property worth $1 million, the 10% interest would be valued not at $100,000, but at some lesser discounted value.

The New Proposal

If H. R. 436 becomes law, appraisers would no longer be allowed to apply valuation discounts to “non-business” assets held by partnerships. The value would be determined as if the transferor had transferred the assets directly to the transferee. In the example above, the interest would be valued at $100,000.

The Return of Family Attribution
An additional provision of the new bill seeks to eliminate minority discounts in valuations of companies where the transferee does not control the entity, but the transferee’s family does. In other words, a father who owns 100% of a company would no longer be able to avail himself of a minority discount by giving, say, a one third interest to a child

If passed, the provisions of this bill would apply to transfers taking place after the date of enactment. This suggests that there might still be some time left to take advantage of the valuation discounts that are still available.